Less than seven decades from the birth of the modern state of Israel it has experienced seven wars. The region departing farther from a resolution in what has now become one the oldest conflicts in modern history. Surrounded by a sea of Arab nations who would deny Israel the sovereign right to defend herself? Who would deny Israel peace?

Perhaps those who would kill any remaining possibility of peace. The distinguished Israeli newspaper Haaretz  indicated that the Hamas leader Ahmed Jabari was considering a permanent ceasefire with Israel hours before his assassination on the 14^th of November. Gershon Baskin famous for his role in negotiating the release of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, and columnist for The Jerusalem post described that he learnt learnt first hand "Mr. Jabari wasn't just interested in a long-term cease-fire; he was also the person responsible for enforcing previous cease-fires". IDF spokesman Brigadier-General Yoav Mordechai reported that Israel could expect rocket attacks and a continued conflict following the assassination.

Logic would suggest that not killing the cease fire hope (Jabari) would be a more effective means of defending against rocket fire and establishing peace not to mention saving human life (assuming that's a consideration). If  prevention is better than cure, then provocation would suggest the intent is to neither prevent nor cure. So who is denying Israel peace?

Perhaps those with one sided condemnations and selective memories only registering rocket attacks before and after. Has anyone heard of Hamid Younis? The 13 year old boy who on the 8^th of November put on his Real Madrid shirt to play soccer outside the house, the boy who was dressed to deflect soccer balls not IDF machine gun fire which pierced his chest and stole his life. According to many including Emily L. Hauser  an American-Israeli writer this was the start of the current conflict. So who would deny Israel peace?

Hamid Younis

As academics and lawyers debate whether target killings are a legitimate and sophisticated method of self defense or just a sophisticated name for terrorism, history suggests they strengthen resistance rather than crippling it. IDF target assassinations have killed  233 civilians including 71 children from September 2000 to June 2008  alone .The latest targeted assassination has managed to cripple the chance for peace, whilst strengthening Hamas's will to launch rockets into Israel.

Deadly rocket attacks have become the central focus of  Newspaper headlines and world leader condemnations. Millions of Israelis live under this indiscriminate threat. Thousands of rockets have been fired at Israel since the history of the conflict claiming 26 lives, as of November 17, 2012 ,  including non civilians and non Jews. Targeted killing have killed 233 civilians including 71 children. Simple maths would suggests the deaths from targeted killings are at least nine times more indiscriminate than the indiscriminate rocket attacks. Traffic fatalities  have claimed 15 times more Israeli lives just in the last year than rocket and mortar attacks have in the entire history of the conflict. No wonder the Israeli defense ministry considers the rockets as "more of a psychological than a physical threat".  With an early Israeli election looming is it worth considering the perpetrators of  psychological warfare and manipulation of the Israeli people? Who is denying Israel peace?

Following Netanyahu's failed campaign of rallying US support into bombing Iran, an unprecedented low in US Israeli relations was recognized across the world. Obama's win was described as loss for Netanyahu, voters began to question whether he was the right person to maintain Israel's special relationship with United States. Are wars not the ultimate test of a relationship? Following the early silence, the Zionist Organization of America urged president Obama to personally condemn the attacks and some days later he did.