 |
|
Indian Army chief visited
military bases, camps and posts during his weeklong visit to the United
States in April 2002 |
India's military relationship
with the U.S. continues to grow. Washington has concluded that U.S. relations
with traditional allies such as South Korea and Japan have become fragile, and
it is time to develop closer strategic ties with India. In May 2002, Douglas
Feith, Undersecretary of Defense Policy, hosted a meeting of the U.S.-India
Defense Policy Group to map out joint defense strategies. These included
planning joint naval patrols of the strategic Malacca Strait, workshops on
missile defense, and cooperation in defense technology.
Relations between the two
countries have blossomed with the recent Malabar IV exercises, which involved
coordinated maneuvers between the two navies. According to Martin Walker of
United Press International, "the United States and India are already virtual
allies, and share a strong military relationship with Israel." The Bush
administration has approved the sale of three Israeli Phalcon AWACS to India and
is likely to approve the sale of the Arrow-2 anti-missile system, jointly
developed by Israel and the U.S. These weapon systems could shift the balance of
power in Asia, and make India invulnerable to missile attacks.
Reflecting this deepening of
ties between Washington and New Delhi, a U.S.-India Institute for Strategic
Policy has been launched with a major but unspoken objective: containing China.
The Institute, affiliated with the ultra conservative Center for Security
Policy, is also intended to limit the growth in U.S.-Pakistani ties.
After India dismembered
Pakistan in 1971, it began to see itself as the preeminent and pivotal power in
South Asia. The Indira Doctrine, enunciated at the beginning of the Sri Lankan
civil war in 1983, stated that India was entitled to be the security manager of
the entire subcontinent. The BJP embraced this vision wholeheartedly. India is
now determined to become a "great power," since it is home to one-sixth of
humanity and heir to a great civilization. A major factor that is adduced in
favor of this claim is India's dynamic economy, which comprises a diverse
technological base that produces world-class software as well as nuclear weapons
and rockets capable of launching satellites into space. To further its claims to
being a great power, India is anxious to acquire a permanent seat on the U.N.
Security Council. India's smaller neighbors, who were not consulted in the
development of this Indo-centric vision, are concerned about being reduced to
satellite states of India.
India's security policy is
built around four threat perceptions. First is the challenge to national unity,
which comes from separatist movements that are active on its northeastern and
northwestern frontiers. Continuing rebellions in the northeast require India to
maintain a garrison of two to four army divisions in that region. India
perceives that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence is furthering the
rebellions in the northeast. It is also concerned that Myanmar and Bangladesh
have become involved (at least at the non-governmental level) with the
separatist movements, since they are hosting India's rebel groups in their
territories. In the northwest, the long-standing insurgency in Kashmir continues
to bleed India, and requires the stationing of several hundred thousand troops
in the state.
Ads by Google:
Advertisements not controlled by IslamiCity
|
The second threat emanates
from Pakistan. India's fear of Pakistan mirrors Pakistan's fear of India. One of
India's leading strategists suspects that Pakistan masterminded the Tehelka
corruption scandal. Others suspects that Pakistan aims to disrupt India by
funding and instigating organized crime in India. One analyst has argued that
Pakistan caused the crash of the Indian stock exchange, and caused more damage
to the Indian economy than what could have achieved by bombing major Indian
cities. Pakistan is viewed as a thorn that is permanently lodged in India's
western hide. Its close ties with America and China over the past fifty years
have thwarted India's policy of translating economic and military preeminence in
South Asia into legitimate predominance.
The rivalry with Pakistan has
driven the recent modernization programs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air
Force. Prithvi short-range ballistic missiles have been deployed on the
Pakistani border in the army's 333rd Missile Regiment. In the post 9/11 time
frame, the threat of Pakistani-sponsored terrorism has been played up as a major
problem. India has begun to reach out to Pakistan's traditional allies such as
Saudi Arabia and Iran, in order to impede Pakistan's diplomatic maneuverability.
During the past couple of years, India's foreign minister visited Saudi Arabia,
Vajpayee visited Iran and Iranian President Khatami was the Chief Guest at the
Republican Day parade in New Delhi. Since 1970, India has unsuccessfully sought
membership in the Organization of Islamic Countries, to further its image as a
secular democracy with a large Muslim population.
Third, India feels threatened
by China. This has driven India's nuclear and ballistic missile program. India
has embarked on a grandiose program to challenge China's dominance in Southeast
Asia. The Indian Navy is at the start of a 30-year buildup, to counter the 50-year
plan of the Chinese Navy. There are plans to induct three aircraft carriers in
the Indian Navy, and to install nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles on major
warships. In the next few years, the navy's "area of interest" will extend for
7,000 miles from west to east along the Indian Ocean littoral. Ultimately, India
intends to project naval power into the South China Sea.
Finally, India perceives an
embryonic threat emanating from the U.S., which is now the world's unchallenged
superpower. This factor has driven India to acquire an ICBM capability. One
assumes that while the U.S. has found it convenient to enlist India as a partner
in its drive to contain China, it would also seek to restrain India's ambitions
toward its smaller neighbors. Otherwise, it may inadvertently lay the seeds for
creating an Iraq-like situation in South Asia.
To meet these perceived
threats, India currently spends $14 billion annually on defense. Over half of
this budget is devoted to fighting a conventional land war against Pakistan.
Pakistan's nuclear weapons have reduced the likelihood of such a war, since the
risks of escalation are simply too great for even the BJP to countenance. The
probability that China would attack India remains remote, since the Middle
Kingdom does not have a history of imperialism.
If India were to resolve the
Kashmir issue, it could redirect some of the billions being spent on its
military toward social and economic development. It is a nation where half of
the children are malnourished, 350 million go to bed hungry, and 300 million are
illiterate. The combined budget deficit exceeds 10% of GDP. These statistics
paint the portrait of a power that is long past its prime, not one that is
gearing up to greatness.