|
|
|
Manufacturing Fear
3/17/2009
- Social Political - Article Ref: IC0903-3828 Number of comments: 39 Opinion Summary: Agree:23 Disagree:4 Neutral:12
By: Dr. Aslam Abdullah
IslamiCity* -
If I write a column arguing that Bernard
Madoff, a Jew by birth, cheated mostly Christian investors of billions of
dollars, you will rightly call me crazy.
If I argue that some Jewish religious
organizations that received money from Madoff were thriving on the loot, you
will rightly call me insane.
If I whisper that Madoff was a supporter
of Israel and his intention was to financially help the Zionist land, you will
call me an anti-Semitic.
If I say that Madoff was a family man who
was trying to support his family and community that is always the victim of
anti-Semites, you will definitely jump to my throat.
If I say that Madoff was reading the
Jewish scriptures and using some verses that justify maltreatment of gentiles to
launch his ponzy schemes, you will definitely call me a mad man and rightly so.
Similarly, If I argue that the gunman who
shot 10 people dead in Alabama was a devout Christian and he killed all those
who in his views were not practicing Christians, you would hate me for that.
If I write that he acted on the basis of
his readings of the Bible where the Lord had condemned all those who deviate,
you would call me ignorant.
If I say that several Biblical passages
incite people to act violently you would ridicule me and rightly so.
Now if someone were to say the following:
| Omar
Hussein, a Muslim by birth, cheated mostly Christian investors of
billions of dollars ...
Muslim religious
organizations that receive money from Hussein were thriving on the loot
...
Hussein was a
supporter of Palestine and his intention was to financially help the
Muslim lands ...
Hussein was
reading the Muslim scriptures and using some verses that defile gentiles
to launch his ponzy schemes ...
The gunman who
shot 10 people dead in Kabul was a devout Muslim and he killed all those
who in his view were not practicing Muslims ...
He acted on the
basis of his reading of the Quran where the Lord had condemned all those
who deviate ...
Several Quranic
passages incite people to act violently ... |
Reading the above most people would tend
to nod their head saying that Islam promotes these kinds of acts and Muslims
follow the Quran whose teachings are based on such deceptions. This is what many
in North America and Europe have done for the last several years. Since, they do
not allow any counter argument, and the voices of Muslims are weak in
challenging their absurdity and the average people do not care much about these
things, they get away without being called crazy, insane, ignorant, lunatic,
anti-Muslim or Islamophobic.
You may say that this is a weak argument
because those Muslims who are killing innocent people are calling it an Islamic
act. So what? If 675 people are killed in the United States every week because
we have the freedom to own gun under second amendment, and the killer calls it a
constitutional freedom, will we give any credence to their statement?
Will we hold democracy responsible for
this?
But when it comes to Islam and Muslims,
many of our pundits and experts and analysts indulge in the most insane, bizarre
and crazy analysis without being questioned. Instead they are often rewarded for
their nonsense.
Their analysis or explanation is just
another manifestation of their deep rooted prejudices against Islam regardless
of what they say. They have the notion that Islam is a primitive and backward
religion because most Muslims in the world today are illiterate or poor. They
still have the idea that Islam is a false religion that promotes violence and
immorality because that is what they have read in books written by their
predecessors hundreds of years ago or said by their pastors, rabbis or religious
leaders uninterruptedly for years.
This kind of analysis can only promote
hatred and sensationalize an issue. But it would not solve a problem. For almost
nine years, we are fighting a war on terrorism which in the view of right wing
Christians, Zealot Hindus, and Extremist Zionists is a war on Islamic terrorism.
In their analysis the world faces the danger of Islamic terror.
Now look at the reality.
In Europe, according to a European
Council report, in the year 2007, 583 failed, foiled and successful terrorist
acts took place. Out of that four were attributed to Islamists, 21 to left wing,
1 to right wing, and 532 to separatists. How come we never heard of those terror
acts committed by separatists? How come there was little analysis of those acts?
How come the Western intellectuals are silent on such terror related incidents?

Ads by Google:
Advertisements not controlled by IslamiCity
|
EU
Terrorism Situation And Trend Report
Doubtlessly, our world faces a serious
challenge from those who have used violence as a means to promote their
political and even religious agenda. But we cannot simply hold an entire faith
and community responsible for that. As long as we will continue to do that, we
will never be able to understand the real motives behind such acts of terrorism.
Consequently, we will promote hatred and prejudices that will never enable us to
face the real problems and work towards establishing a more harmonious society.
In the process, many innocent people would be condemned to torture,
discrimination and even death.
Dr. Aslam Abdullah is editor of the
Detroit based English weekly, Muslim Observer, director of the Islamic Society
of Nevada, Las Vegas and the recently elected General Secretary of the World
Council of Muslims for Interfaith Relation. He is also the vice President of the
Muslim Council of America, MCA.
( RSS Feed / Podcasting
)
|
The opinions expressed herein, through this article or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of
iViews. These are offered as a means for iViews to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization.
The iViews site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. iViews is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use any copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
|